EXPLORING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MALADAPTIVE DAYDREAMING AND CREATIVE WRITING PRODUCTIVITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v8i2.18250Keywords:
Maladaptive day dreaming, creative writing, writing productivity, psychological and pedagogical approachAbstract
This study explores the relationship between maladaptive daydreaming and creative writing performance among students in the English Language Education Program at Musi Charitas Catholic University. Using a quantitative correlational method with total sampling, data were gathered through two questionnaires distributed to all students. The findings reveal a significant positive correlation between daydreaming and creative writing, indicating that while daydreaming can inspire creativity and ideas, it may also hinder focus and academic performance. Students acknowledged daydreaming as a source of relaxation and creative thought, yet emphasized the need to manage it during lessons to remain productive. The study highlights the dual role of daydreaming both beneficial and disruptive in academic settings. It suggests that educators can harness its creative potential by incorporating structured writing tasks that align with students’ imaginative thinking. A balanced approach, combining creativity with focus, is essential for maximizing student engagement and well-being. This research offers unique insight into how maladaptive daydreaming influences English education students’ writing skills and provides practical considerations for integrating this phenomenon into classroom practice.
References
Alharbi, W. (2023). AI in the foreign language classroom: a pedagogical overview of automated writing assistance tools. Education Research International, 2023, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/4253331
American Academy of Pediatrics. (2019). Addressing early childhood emotional and behavioral problems. Pediatrics, 138(6). https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-3025.
Andina, D. M., Cahyono, B. Y., & Widiati, U. (2020). How english foreign language students’ autonomy and digital competence relate to their writing achievement. Tadris : Jurnal Keguruan Dan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 5(1), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v5i1.5760
Bailey, C., & Bizzaro, P. (2019). Research in Creative Writing: Theory into Practice. Research in the Teaching English, 52(1), 77–97. https://doi.org/10.58680/rte201729201
Bigelsen, J., Lehrfeld, J. M., Jopp, D. S., & Somer, E. (2019). Maladaptive daydreaming: Evidence for an under-researched mental health disorder. Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal, 42, 254–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2016.03.017
Bressane, A., Zwirn, D., Essiptchouk, A., Saraiva, A. C. V., Carvalho, F. L. de C., Formiga, J. K. S., Medeiros, L. C. de C., & Negri, R. G. (2024). Understanding the role of study strategies and learning disabilities on student academic performance to enhance educational approaches: A proposal using artificial intelligence. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6(September 2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100196
Bultseva, M., & Lebedeva, N. (2018). The role of individual values and motivation in creative writing productivity of poets and prose writers. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 15, 675-694.
Castelló, M., McAlpine, L., & Pyhältö, K. (2017). Spanish and UK post-PhD researchers: writing perceptions, well-being and productivity. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(6), 1108–1122. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1296412.
Clark, E., Ross, A. S., Tan, C., Ji, Y., & Smith, N. A. (2018). Creative Writing with a Machine in the Loop: Case Studies on Slogans and Stories. IUI ’18: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, 329–240. https://doi.org/10.1145/3172944.3172983
Dhananjaya, P. A., Karima, F. H., & Egar, N. (2024). Improving students’ writing skill in writing descriptive text using brainstorming plus webbing techniques. Journal of Nusantara Education, 3(2), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.57176/jn.v3i2.100
Dickinson, K. (2023). The secret life of maladaptive daydreaming. BIG THINK. https://bigthink.com/neuropsych/maladaptive-daydreaming.
Fiialka, S., Kornieva, Z., & Honcharuk, T. (2024). The use of ChatGPT in creative writing assistance. XLinguae, 17(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2024.17.01.01
Fitria, T. N. (2024). Creative writing skills in english: develop students’ potential and creativity. EBONY: Journal of English Language Teaching, Linguistics, and Literature, 4(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.37304/ebony.v4i1.10908
Gonçalves, F., Campos, P., Hanna, J., & Ashby, S. (2015). You're the voice: Evaluating user interfaces for encouraging underserved youths to express themselves through creative writing. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition (C&C '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1145/2757226.2757236.
Han, Y., & Hiver, P. (2018). Investigating high schoolers’ L2 writing anxiety, L2 writing self-efficacy, L2. writing self-regulated strategies, and L2 writing engagement: Relationships and mediator effects. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1012407.
Jaya, A., Hartono, R., Wahyuni, S., & Yulianto, H. J. (2025). Los efectos de la estrategia de aprendizaje basado en proyectos con actividad física en función del género sobre el rendimiento escolar y la confianza en sí mismos de los estudiantes. Retos: Nuevas Tendencias En Educación Física, Deporte y Recreación, 66, 349–360. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v66.110067
Jones, S., & Flint, A. (2022). Digital platforms and the democratization of creative writing: exploring new literacies and online communities. Journal of New Literacies, 15(2), 45–60.
Kammad, Z. A. H., Al-Sabbagh, A. I., & Hussain, M. A. (2021). Prevalence of proneness to maladaptive daydreaming syndrome in Basra medical students. Elementary Education Online, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2021.01.007.
Kaufman, S. B. (2019). Wired to create: Unraveling the mysteries of the creative mind. Penguin. NY, NY: Perigee, Penguin Random House LLC.
Kye, B., Han, N., Kim, E., Park, Y., & Jo, S. (2021). Educational applications of metaverse: Possibilities and limitations. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 18, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.32
Lara-Aparicio, M., López-Fernández, I., & Mayorga-Vega, D. (2024). Effect of creative and reproductive dance sessions on high school students’ physical activity, perceived exertion, and flow state. Retos, 58, 147–156. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v58.106120
Long, S. R. (2017). Write place at the write time: A study of how writing contexts affect rates of productivity and perceptions of success in creative writing. James Madison University.
Lukita, C., Hardini, M., Pranata, S., Julianingsih, D., & Santoso, N. P. L. (2023). Transformation of entrepreneurship and digital technology students in the era of revolution 4.0. APTISI Transactions on Technopreneurship, 5(3), 291–304. https://doi.org/10.34306/att.v5i3.356
Mariani R., Musetti A., Di Monte C, Danskin K., Franceschini C., & Christian C. (2022). Maladaptive daydreaming in relation to linguistic features and attachment style. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3390%2Fijerph19010386
Neuman, W. L. (2019). Social research methods: Qualitative and Quantitative approaches. In Pearson (Seventh Ed). Pearson New International Edition. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Social-Research-Methods-Quantitative/dp/0205786839/ref=sr_1_5?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1461496914&sr=1-5&keywords=social+research+methods+qualitative+and+quantitative+approaches
Nielsen, R., Fletcher, R., Newman, N., Brennern, J., & Howard, P. (2020). Navigating the “infodemic”: how people in six countries access and rate news and information about coronavirus. Reuters institute for the study of journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/infodemic-how-people-six-countries-access-and-rate-news-and-information-about-coronavirus
Piller, E. (2021). Moonlighting together: Faculty (creative) writing groups. New Writing, 19(4), 491–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790726.2021.2004168.
Royani, I., & Sihombing, M. R. (2023). Exploring the Opportunities and Challenges of ChatGPT in Academic Writing. in international conference on educational theories, practices, and research, 1(01), 277–286.
Schilbach L, Eickhoff SB, Rotarska-Jagiela A, Fink GR, Vogeley K. (2008). Minds at rest? Social cognition as the default mode of cognizing and its putative relationship to the "default system" of the brain. Conscious Cogn. 17(2):457-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.03.013.
Somer E, Lehrfeld J, Bigelsen J, Jopp DS. (2016). Development and validation of the Maladaptive Daydreaming Scale (MDS). Conscious Cogn. 39, 77-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2015.12.001.
Sugiyono. (2021). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Kombinasi, R&D dan Penelitian Pendidikan) (A. Nuryanto (ed.); Kedua). ALFABETA, CV.
Thankavel, S. (2023). Artificial intelligence integrated language teaching to enhance creative speaking and creative writing of engineering learners …. Journal of Research Administration, 5(2). https://journalofresearchadmin.com/index.php/jra/article/view/5%0Ahttps://journalofresearchadmin.com/index.php/jra/article/download/5/6
White, P. (2012). An introduction to maladaptive daydreaming. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
West, M. J., Somer, E., & Eigsti, I.-M. (2023). Immersive and maladaptive daydreaming and divergent thinking in autism spectrum disorders. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 42(4), 372-398. https://doi.org/10.1177/02762366221129819
Zhang, D., Pee, L. ., & Cui, L. (2021). Artificial intelligence in e-commerce fulfillment: a case study of resource orchestration at alibaba’s smart warehouse. International Journal of Information Management, 57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102304
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yohanes Heri Pranoto, Angel Seanita

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.











