EXPLORING THE ROLE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN ACADEMIC WRITING AMONG STUDENTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31851/9zyg6g35Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Academic Writing, Student Perception, Writing QualityAbstract
This study explores the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools, specifically ChatGPT and Grammarly, in enhancing students’ academic writing. Using a qualitative descriptive approach, data were collected through observations, semi-structured interviews, and document analysis of 20 students’ writing drafts before and after AI-assisted revisions. The findings show that 1) Students experienced several advantages from AI use, including faster idea generation, improved grammar, better sentence structure, enhanced vocabulary, and increased writing productivity, although some students exhibited overreliance on AI, which may limit independent writing skills. 2) AI tools also contributed to the development of academic knowledge and creativity, as students used AI suggestions to refine arguments, expand ideas, and improve overall coherence and academic tone. 3) Regarding perceptions, students generally viewed AI positively, noting that it increased their confidence, motivation, and engagement in writing, while also recognizing the importance of critical evaluation to avoid dependency. Overall, the study indicates that AI tools can effectively support both technical and cognitive aspects of academic writing when integrated with reflective and guided practices.
References
Ahmed, A., & Ahmed, M. (2022). Academic writing: Types, elements, and strategies. IJLHE: International Journal of Language, Humanities, and Education, 5(2), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.52217/ijlhe.v5i2.989
Alharbi, W. (2023). AI in the Foreign Language Classroom: A Pedagogical Overview of Automated Writing Assistance Tools. Education Research International, 2023, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/4253331
Aljuaid, H. (2024). The impact of artificial intelligence tools on academic writing instruction in higher education: A systematic review. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), Special Issue on ChatGPT, 26–55. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/ChatGPT.2
Amin, M. Y. M. (2023). AI and Chat GPT in language teaching: enhancing EFL classroom support and transforming assessment techniques. International Journal of Higher Education Pedagogies, 4(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.33422/ijhep.v4i4.554
Christou, P. A. (2023). The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in qualitative research for theory development. Philpapers, 28(9), 2739–2755. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2023.6536
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design : choosing among five approaches. In SAGE Publications, Inc. (Fourth, Vol. 44, Issue 4).
Crompton, H., Edmett, A., Ichaporia, N., & Burke, D. (2024). AI and English language teaching: Affordances and challenges. British Journal of Educational Technology, March, 2503–2529. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13460
Dai, C. P., & Ke, F. (2022). Educational applications of artificial intelligence in simulation-based learning: A systematic mapping review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3(January), 100087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100087
Dergaa, I., Chamari, K., Zmijewski, P., & Saad, H. Ben. (2023). From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing. Biology of Sport, 40(2), 615–622. https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2023.125623
El Maamri, O. (2025). Towards the modelling of a writing process integrating generative AI to develop the argumentative skills of secondary school writers. XLinguae, 18(1), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2025.18.01.10
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2018). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
Fadilah, I. A., Jaya, A., & Uzer, Y. (2023). Visual representation and comprehension: The exploration of multimodal text to energize reading of the tenth grade students’ at state vocational high school 5 of palembang. Esteem Journal of English Education Study Programme, 6(1), 125–130. https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v6i1.10226
Gardner, H. E. (2018). Motivational variables in second language acquisition. In In S. H. Foster-Cohen, M. S. García, & M. B. Reinders (Eds.), An introduction to language and linguistics (pp. 83–102). Cambridge University Press.
Gerlich, M. (2025). AI tools in society: Impacts on cognitive offloading and the future of critical thinking. Societies, 15(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15010006
Hadianti, S., & Rohmah, D. W. M. (2021). English teachers’ perception on using digital tools in the classroom. Exposure : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, 10(2), 234–241. https://doi.org/10.26618/exposure.v10i2.5769
Halvorson, O. (2024). AI in academia: Policy development, ethics, and curriculum design. College of Professional and Global Education, 14(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.55917/2575-2499.1533
Hermida, R. (2024). Student challenges in academic paragraph writing: A study in Aceh, Indonesia. Journal Unmuha, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.37598/accentia.v4i2.2270
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Center dfor Curriculum Redesign.
Kartika, S., Jaya, A., Hermansyah, Pratiwi, E., & Kartikasari, D. (2024). The use of mobile-assisted language learning (mall) technology in English class. Esteem: Journal of English Education Study Programme, 7(1), 109–118.
Khalifa, M., & Albadawy, M. (2024). Using artificial intelligence in academic writing and research: An essential productivity tool. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update, 5(8), 100145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpbup.2024.100145
Kvale, S. (2021). Doing Interviews. Sage Publications.
Lin, Z. (2025). Techniques for supercharging academic writing with generative AI. Nature Biomedical Engineering, 1(9), 426–431. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-024-01185-8
Lukita, C., Hardini, M., Pranata, S., Julianingsih, D., & Santoso, N. P. L. (2023). Transformation of entrepreneurship and digital Technology Students in the Era of Revolution 4.0. APTISI Transactions on Technopreneurship, 5(3), 291–304. https://doi.org/10.34306/att.v5i3.356
Madhavi, E., Sivapurapu, L., Koppula, V., Esther Rani, P. B., & Sreehari, V. (2023). Developing learners’ english speaking skills using ICT and AI tools. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 32(2), 142–153. https://doi.org/10.37934/ARASET.32.2.142153
Mandal, M., & Srinivas, K. (2022). Education technology in schools: Locating the teacher in the changing landscape of teaching-learning: A study in secondary schools. He International Review of Information Ethics, 32(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.29173/irie492
Mazrou, K. Al, & Alzyoudi, M. (2024). The role of ChatGPT in mitigating loneliness among older adults: An exploratory study. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 14(4), e202444. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/14777
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2019). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook, 2nd ed. In Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook, 2nd ed. Sage Publications, Inc.
Neuman, W. L. (2019). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. In Pearson (Seventh Ed). Pearson New International Edition. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Social-Research-Methods-Quantitative/dp/0205786839/ref=sr_1_5?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1461496914&sr=1-5&keywords=social+research+methods+qualitative+and+quantitative+approaches
Ngoc, N. T. N., Truc, T. T., An, N. N. H., Phat, L. H., San, N. H. M., & Thu, T. N. A. (2025). The Benefits and challenges of AI translation tools in translation education at the tertiary level: A systematic review. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 5(2), 132–148. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.25527
Nygård, A. (2024). Testing teachers’ abilities to distinguish between translations produced by students, Google Translate and ChatGPT [NTNU]. https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3148912
Oshima, A. (2019). Writing Academic English (4th ed.). Pearson Education.
Pokrivcakova, S. (2019). Preparing teachers for the application of AI-powered technologies in foreign language education. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 7(3), 135–153. https://doi.org/10.2478/jolace-2019-0025
Rehman, F., Muhammad Abdul Majeed Ahmed, H., & Umar Mehmood, M. (2025). Academic writing challenges in English: A linguistic and psychological analysis of university students. Journal of Political Stability Archive, 3(1), 503–524. https://www.journalpsa.com.pk/index.php/JPSA/article/view/85
Rosdiana, S., Noercolies, M. A., & Fauzan, M. H. (2024). The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Teaching Writing Skills. EDUCASIA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Pengajaran, Dan Pembelajaran, 9(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.21462/educasia.v9i1.251
Royani, I., & Sihombing, M. R. (2023). Exploring the opportunities and challenges of chatgpt in academic writing. In International Conference on Educational Theories, Practices, and Research, 1(01), 277–286.
Sokolov. (2019). Theory and practice in artificial intelligence. Вестник Российской Академии Наук, 89(4), 365–370. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869-5873894365-370
Song, C., & Song, Y. (2023). Enhancing academic writing skills and motivation: assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT in AI-assisted language learning for EFL students. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1260843. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260843
Verdegem, P. (2024). Dismantling AI capitalism: the commons as an alternative to the power concentration of Big Tech. AI and Society, 39(2), 727–737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01437-8
Wei, L. (2023). Artificial intelligence in language instruction: impact on English learning achievement, L2 motivation, and self-regulated learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1261955
Williyan, A., Fitriati, S. W., Pratama, H., & Sakhiyya, Z. (2024). AI as co-creator: exploring Indonesian EFL teachers’ collaboration with AI in content development. Teaching English with Technology, 24(2), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.56297/vaca6841/LRDX3699/RZOH5366
Zhang, H., Xu, X., Lei, V. N. L., Hong, W. C. H., & Jie, W. (2025). Academic writing challenges and supports for early-stage Chinese postgraduates: A mixed-methods study on teaching-research integration, supervisor engagement, and self-efficacy. PLoS ONE, 20(2 February). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317470
Zhang, J., Wang, H., & Liu, Y. (2021). Effects of interactive video on second language listening. Language Learning and Tecnology, 25(2), 87–104.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Evi Rosmiyati, Noviati, Aswadi Jaya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
