Efficiency of Conventional Banks in Indonesia: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach

Authors

  • Muhammad Ridho Sahputra Universitas Sriwijaya
  • Shelly Prahadian Putri Universitas Sriwijaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31851/jmwe.v23i2.21702

Keywords:

Banking Efficiency, Data Envelopment Analysis, Production Approach, Profit Approach, Conventional Bank

Abstract

The goal of this study is to find out the efficiency of conventional banks on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the 2021–2024 period using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) with profit and production approaches through panel data regression. This research uses a quantitative explanatory approach with purposive sampling. The sample consists of 32 conventional commercial banks with 128 observations. The DEA profit approach uses assets, operating expenses, and equity as inputs and net income as output, while the production approach uses assets, equity, and operating expenses as inputs and loans, third-party funds, and fee-based income as outputs. The results show that the average efficiency score of the production approach is higher than the profit approach, at 0.866661 compared to 0.532803. Conventional commercial banks are more efficient in generating intermediation and service outputs than in generating net profit. Large-asset banks generally have higher efficiency scores than medium-asset banks. The regression results show that, in the profit approach, operating expenses have a significant negative effect on efficiency, while net income has a significant positive effect. Meanwhile, in the production approach, operating expenses have a significant positive effect, while fee-based income has a significant negative effect on efficiency. Assets and equity do not significantly affect efficiency in either approach. This study concludes that efficiency is more strongly reflected in production activities than in profit generation. Therefore, banks need to improve cost control, asset productivity, profit optimization, and the efficiency of service-based income to enhance overall banking efficiency.

References

Blankson, N., Anarfo, E. B., Amewu, G., & Doabil, L. (2022). Examining the determinants of bank efficiency in transition: empirical evidence from Ghana. Heliyon, 8(8). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10156

Bueno, L. A., Sigahi, T. F. A. C., Rampasso, I. S., Leal Filho, W., & Anholon, R. (2024). Impacts of digitization on operational efficiency in the banking sector: Thematic analysis and research agenda proposal. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2024.100230

Fakhrunnas, F., Nahar, F. H., & Albana, H. F. (2018). Effects of Macroeconomics Factors toward Efficiency in Banking. JEJAK, 11(2), 390–400. https://doi.org/10.15294/jejak.v11i2.16059

Fukuyama, H., Matousek, R., & Tzeremes, N. G. (2024). A unified framework for nonperforming loan modeling in bank production: An application of data envelopment analysis. Omega (United Kingdom), 126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2024.103063

Gardijan Kedžo, M., & Tuškan Sjauš, B. (2021). The Efficiency Analysis of Large Banks Using the Bootstrap and Fuzzy DEA: A Case of an Emerging Market. Information (Switzerland), 12(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/info12120507

Gherțescu, C., Manta, A. G., Bădîrcea, R. M., & Manta, L. F. (2024). How Does the Digitalization Strategy Affect Bank Efficiency in Industry 4.0? A Bibliometric Analysis. Systems, 12(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12110492

Hadi, A., Amirteimoori, A., Kordrostami, S., & Mehrabian, S. (2025). An efficiency score unification method in data envelopment analysis using slack-based models with application in banking. Decision Analytics Journal, 14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2024.100541

Henriques, I. C., Sobreiro, V. A., Kimura, H., & Mariano, E. B. (2020). Two-stage DEA in banks: Terminological controversies and future directions. Expert Systems with Applications, 161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113632

Horvat, A. M., Milenković, N., Dudić, B., Kalaš, B., Radovanov, B., & Mittelman, A. (2023). Evaluating Bank Efficiency in the West Balkan Countries Using Data Envelopment Analysis. Mathematics, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/math11010015

Istaiteyeh, R., Milhem, M. M., & Elsayed, A. (2024). Efficiency Assessment and Determinants of Performance: A Study of Jordan’s Banks Using DEA and Tobit Regression. Economies, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/economies12020037

Jia, K., & Liu, X. (2023). Bank digital transformation, bank competitiveness, and systemic risk. Frontiers in Physics, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2023.1297912

Kweh, Q. L., Lu, W. M., Tone, K., & Liu, H. M. (2024). Evaluating the resource management and profitability efficiencies of US commercial banks from a dynamic network perspective. Financial Innovation, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-023-00531-0

Liu, T. L., Naveed, M. M., Mustafa, S., & Naveed, M. T. (2024). Analysing the impact of digital technology diffusion on the efficiency and convergence process of the commercial banking industry of Pakistan. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03184-1

Mateev, M., Tariq, M. U., & Sahyouni, A. (2023). Efficiency, market concentration, and bank performance during the COVID-19 outbreak: Evidence from the MENA region. PLoS ONE, 18(5 MAY). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285403

Milenković, N., Radovanov, B., Kalaš, B., & Horvat, A. M. (2022). External Two-Stage DEA Analysis of Bank Efficiency in West Balkan Countries. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020978

Nugraha, M., Prastowo, D., Prastowo Darminto, D., & Djaddang, S. (2023). How to cite: Analysis Of Indonesian Banking Efficiency With Data Envelopment Analysis. 8(4). https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2024). Press Release: Reflection 2024: Indonesian Banking Remains Solid and Optimistic Amid Global Economic Uncertainty.

Tolesa Agama, D., Li, S., & Obo, D. D. (2023). Performance Efficiency of Ethiopian Commercial Banks: Data Envelopment Analysis Approach. In Journal of Business and Administrative Studies (Vol. 15, Number 1).

Ul Hassan Shah, W., Wang, B., & Yasmeen, R. (2023). Evaluating the role of banking efficiency, institutions, and financial development for sustainable development: Implications for Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). PLoS ONE, 18(10 October). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290780

Ullah, S., Majeed, A., & Popp, J. (2023). Determinants of banks’ efficiency in an emerging economy: A data envelopment analysis approach. PLoS ONE, 18(3 March). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281663

Venugopal, S. K. (2024). Loan Portfolio Management and Bank Efficiency: A Comparative Analysis of Public, Old Private, and New Private Sector Banks in India. Economies, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/economies12040081

Wang, Y., Chen, L., & Cui, M. (2024). What explains the operational efficiency of listed commercial banks in China? Evidence from a three-stage DEA-tobit modeling analysis. Heliyon, 10(13). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33716

Yewisa, T. D., & Satrianto, A. (2025). Analisis Efisiensi Bank Umum Konvensional di Indonesia. Jurnal Informatika Ekonomi Bisnis, 195–200. https://doi.org/10.37034/infeb.v7i2.1130

Zhu, C., & Wang, R. (2025). Commercial banks performance, ownership types and operations efficiency decomposition in China: a comparative analysis. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04373-2

Zuo, L., Strauss, J., & Zuo, L. (2021). The digitalization transformation of commercial banks and its impact on sustainable efficiency improvements through investment in science and technology. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/su131911028

Downloads

Published

2026-07-17