MARITIME ENGLISH IN FOCUS: A RATER-BASED EVALUATION OF ESP COURSEBOOK QUALITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v8i2.18728Keywords:
Coursebook, Document Analysis, ESP, Maritime English, RatersAbstract
This study assesses the quality of a Maritime English coursebook used in a leading vocational maritime education program in Indonesia. The evaluation is based on expert opinions and criteria drawn from English for Specific Purposes (ESP) principles. A qualitative descriptive method was used, supported by document analysis. Data were collected from four expert raters using a 48-item Likert scale evaluation sheet. The analysis was done manually, focusing on item trends and using thematic categorization based on ESP indicators. The coursebook is considered relevant to maritime contexts, with strengths in vocabulary use and realistic tasks. However, it shows inconsistency in instructional design and does not fully align with learner-centered approaches expected in ESP materials. The findings are useful for maritime education, ESP material development, vocational curriculum design, and coursebook evaluation in applied linguistics, maritime training centers, and language education programs. This study also presents an expert-based evaluation framework for ESP coursebooks in maritime settings, addressing the lack of research using qualitative analysis based on expert judgment rather than student feedback.
References
Ahmmed, R. (2021). A framework for Maritime English language planning in Bangladeshi maritime education and training institutes. SN Social Sciences, 1(7), 168. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43545-021-00188-5
Ahmmed, R., Sinha, B. S., Khan, R., & Islam, D. M. (2020). A needs analysis of maritime English language skills for Bangladeshi seafarers to work on-board ships. Marine Policy, 119, 104041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104041
Alibakhshi, G., Nezakatgoo, B., & Bahremand, A. (2022). Assessing the task based language needs for students of marine engineering. International Journal of Training Research, 20(1), 58-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/14480220.2021.1965903
Anthony, L. (2018). Introducing english for specific purposes. Routledge.
Arslan, R. Ş., & Yıldız, A. (2020). An evaluation of esp coursebooks for vocational high schools. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(2), 927–945.
Basturkmen, H. (2019). Developing courses in english for specific purposes. Palgrave Macmillan.
Boström, M. (2020). Mind the Gap! A quantitative comparison between ship-to-ship communication and intended communication protocol. Safety Science, 123, 104567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104567
Chowdhury, M. N., Shafi, S., Arzaman, M., Farhan, A., Teoh, B. A., Kadhim, K. A., ... & Xuan, A. N. S. (2024). Navigating Human Factors in Maritime Safety: A Review of Risks and Improvements in Engine Rooms of Ocean-Going Vessels. International Journal of Safety & Security Engineering, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsse.140101
Darmawan, I. G. N., Suryadi, A., Budimansyah, D., & Susilo, S. (2024). Indonesian Education: Past, Present, and Future. Taylor & Francis.
Doyle, L., McCabe, C., Keogh, B., Brady, A., & McCann, M. (2020). An overview of the qualitative descriptive design within nursing research. Journal of research in nursing, 25(5), 443-455. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987119880234
Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2021). Better learning through structured teaching: A framework for the gradual release of responsibility. ASCD.
Fitriati, S. W., & Rata, E. (2020). Needs analysis in maritime english course design. Journal of Maritime Education, 6(1), 45–52.
Gabedava, G., & Hu, Y. (2025). Enhancing maritime safety through linguistic analysis: a case study of communication failures in maritime accidents. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 1-15. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13437-025-00371-y
Hellystia, D., & Budiwaty, S. (2023). Communication skills-based need analysis on the teaching and learning of maritime english for vocational school. Journal of Language and Literature, 11(1), 14-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.35760/jll.2023.v11i1.6444
Herdawan, D., Nindita, K., & Setyoningrum, A. A. D. (2021). ESP: A needs analysis of maritime english at polimarin. English Education: Jurnal Tadris Bahasa Inggris, 14(2), 366-387. https://doi.org/10.24042/ee-jtbi.v14i2.9812
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for Specific Purposes: A Learning-Centred Approach. Cambridge University Press.
Irwansyah, R., & Nurjanah, S. (2022). Evaluating english textbooks for maritime vocational schools: a content analysis. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 13–24.
Johnson, M., & Majewska, D. (2022). Formal, Non-Formal, and Informal Learning: What Are They, and How Can We Research Them? Research Report. Cambridge University Press & Assessment.
Katuuk, N. N. C. (2025). Enhancing communication skills in maritime english: effective teaching strategies and key influencing factors. Pubmedia Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.47134/jpbi.v2i2.1196
Kim, H. (2019). Teacher evaluations of esp textbooks: a rater-based study. Asian ESP Journal, 15(3), 79–94.
Kusuma, R. A., & Hidayat, T. (2021). Evaluating the ESP materials for engineering students: a document analysis. ELT Journal, 75(2), 111–120.
Li, Q. (2021). Computational thinking and teacher education: An expert interview study. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 3(2), 324-338. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.224
Limbong, S. S. (2021). Perspective of Cadets towards Maritime English At Polytechnics Of Makassar Merchant Marine. ETERNAL (English, Teaching, Learning, and Research Journal), 7(2), 340-349. https://doi.org/10.24252/Eternal.V72.2021.A7
Odell, V., Molthan-Hill, P., Martin, S., & Sterling, S. (2020). Transformative education to address all sustainable development goals. Quality education, 905-916.
Mashartanto, A. A., Pranata, W., & Siska, S. Y. (2024). Development of learning media maritime english textbook for ratings forming. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 12(3), 1238-1252. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v12i3.11337
Mikulicic, J. Z., Pavlinovic, M., & Trgo, B. (2023, December). Role of maritime English in managing a vessel. In Economic and Social Development (Book of Proceedings), 105th International Scientific Conference on Economic and Social Development (Vol. 227).
Mokhtari, M., & Maouche, S. (2023). Needs Analysis for ESP Teachers: Difficulties encountered by Maritime English Practitioners at the National Maritime High School (NMHS) of Bou-Ismail, Algeria. Algerian Scientific Journal Platform, 14(1), 274-296, https://asjp.cerist.dz/en/article/219186
Ng, E. M. W., Lee, M. K., & Yuen, A. H. K. (2023). Digital Literacy in ESP: Evaluating E-learning Materials. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 61, 101199.
Ngo, N. (2021). Professional development experiences of english as a foreign language lecturers at a vietnamese university (doctoral dissertation, Open Access Te Herenga Waka-Victoria University of Wellington).
Pangestu, M., & Usman, H. (2025, April). Development of maritime english learning materials based on imo standards for navigational communications skills. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Social Science, Environment and Technology Development (pp. 129-138).
Rahmiani, N., Munir, F. S., Anastasia, I., Ratnah, R., Ajiza, M., Nurjanah, R. L., ... & Hasrul, H. (2024). Buku ajar english for specific purposes (ESP). PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.
Rakkus, H., & Darmawan, R. (2022). Authenticity in Maritime English Materials: Do Our Textbooks Reflect Real Communication at Sea? Maritime English Journal, 4(1), 22–35.
Richlin, L. (2023). Blueprint for learning: Constructing college courses to facilitate, assess, and document learning. Taylor & Francis.
Sari, I. P., & Dewi, R. A. (2023). English for Maritime Communication: Integrating IMO Standards in Teaching Practices. Journal of Maritime Pedagogy, 7(1), 90–102.
Simanjuntak, M. B., Rafli, Z., & Utami, S. R. (2024). Enhancing Global Maritime Education: A Qualitative Exploration of Post-Internship Perspectives and Preparedness among Cadets. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 18(4), 1134-1146. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1442593
Smart, A., Sinclair, M., Benavot, A., Bernard, J., Chabbott, C., Russell, S. G., & Williams, J. (2020). Learning for uncertain futures: the role of textbooks, curriculum, and pedagogy. Background paper for the Futures of Education initiative. Commissioned by UNESCO. Zugriff am, 29, 2020.
Smelikova, V., & Penza, I. (2023). Implementation of the ISPS Code provisions in maritime English course for future navigators. Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs, 15(3), 315-329. https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2022.2069073
Stanley, M. (2023). Qualitative descriptive: A very good place to start. In Qualitative research methodologies for occupational science and occupational therapy (pp. 52-67). Routledge.
Suherdi, D., Syafryadin, S., & Harahap, A. (2022). Evaluating ICT-based English Learning Materials: A Multi-Rater Approach. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(3), 708–717.
Thominet, L. (2020). 11. Designing a team-based online technical communication course. Effective Teaching of Technical Communication, 209.
Vidhiasi, D. M., & Syihabuddin, S. (2022). Maritime english: teaching english for maritime sciences or teaching maritime sciences in english?. Saintara: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Maritim, 6(1), 71-77. https://doi.org/10.52475/saintara.v6i1.152
Volkova, A. (2021). Making sense of simulators in teaching maritime English. Актуальнi питання гуманiтарних наук, 42, 34-39. https://doi.org/10.24919/2308-4863/42-3-6
Wahyuni, N. D., Kusni, M., & Safitri, R. (2021). Assessing the Alignment of Maritime English Textbooks with SMCP. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(2), 532–549.
Wibowo, A. H., Gupron, A. K., & Dewi, R. F. (2025). Integrating teaching factory method in esp maritime english: cadets' perceptions and implications for maritime training. Script Journal: Journal of Linguistics and English Teaching, 10(1), 46-67. https://doi.org/10.24903/sj.v10i1.1998
Wood, L. M., Sebar, B., & Vecchio, N. (2020). Application of rigour and credibility in qualitative document analysis: Lessons learnt from a case study. The qualitative report, 25(2), 456-470. https://doi.org/
46743/2160-3715/2020.4240
Yeh, Y. F., Chan, K. K. H., & Hsu, Y. S. (2021). Toward a framework that connects individual TPACK and collective TPACK: A systematic review of TPACK studies investigating teacher collaborative discourse in the learning by design process. Computers & education, 171, 104238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104238
Yulia, Y., Siregar, A. P., & Anggraeni, R. (2022). Designing ESP Materials for Vocational Learners: A Need-Based Approach. International Journal of Language Education, 6(3), 123–134.
Zhang, X., & Lin, J. (2021). Cultural Relevance in ESP Textbooks: A Case of Maritime English. English for Specific Purposes World, 59, 1–15.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yusi Rahmawati, Sri Wuli Fitriati, Widhiyanto, Sri Wahyuni
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
