LANGUAGE AND MEANING IN THE TAYUB TRADITION IN TEGALAGUNG VILLAGE TUBAN REGENCY THROUGH A SOCIOSEMIOTIC APPROACH

Authors

  • Archielian Satrio Putro Pambudi Universitas Dr. Soetomo Surabaya
  • Hetty Purnamasari Universitas Dr. Soetomo Surabaya
  • Imron Amrullah Universitas Dr. Soetomo Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v8i2.19193

Keywords:

Sociosemiotics, Social Function, Symbolic Interactionism, Tayub Tradition, Language

Abstract

The Tayub tradition in Tegalagung Village, Tuban Regency, is a cultural performance that combines dance, music, and symbolic language reflecting the values and identity of the local community. This study explores how verbal and non-verbal language in Tayub carries social meaning using a sociosemiotic approach. Data were collected through observation and interviews with key cultural actors, including dancers (ledhek), musicians, and elders. The analysis applies Peirce’s semiotic theory and the concept of symbolic interaction to understand how language and signs operate in Tayub performances. Findings show that Tayub functions not only as entertainment but also as a medium of communication, cultural preservation, and social bonding. Verbal elements such as song lyrics and spoken interactions convey messages of love, respect, and tradition, while non-verbal signs like gestures, costumes, and facial expressions carry symbolic meanings that reflect social roles and values. The use of language in Tayub is context-dependent and varies according to the performer, audience, and setting. This study highlights the importance of understanding traditional performances through a linguistic and semiotic lens to preserve their cultural significance and deepen appreciation of local heritage.

References

Afisi, O. T. (2020). The concept of semiotics in charles sanders peirce’s pragmatism. Rends in Semantics and Pragmatics. Researchgate.

Ali, I. F., Tolapa, M., & Nua, S. P. (2022). Analisis Semiotika Unsur-Unsur Budaya Jawa Timur dalam Film Bumi Manusia. Hulondalo: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Ilmu Komunikasi, 1(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.59713/jipik.v1i1.28

Bourdie, P. (2018). The forms of capital. Routledge.

Brooks, C., Waterton, E., Saul, H., & Renzaho, A. (2023). Exploring the relationships between heritage tourism, sustainable community development and host communities’ health and wellbeing: A systematic review. Journal Plos One, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282319

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. h. (2014). How To Design And Evaluate Research In Education (Eighth Edi). McGraw-Hill Education.

Grace, S., et al. (2017). Post-Strukturalisme: Sebuah Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra.

Hall, S., Evans, J., & Nixon, S. (2024). Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. Sage Publications.

Halliday, M. A. . (2019). Language as Social Semiotic. Edward Arnold.

Hartanto, D., Kusmaedi, N., Ma’mun, A., & Abduljabar, B. (2021). Integrating social skills in traditional games with physical education interventions. International Journal of Human Movement and Sports Sciences, 9(5), 921–928. https://doi.org/10.13189/saj.2021.090513

Jaya, A., Hartono, R., Wahyuni, S., & Yulianto, H. J. (2025). From silent to supreme: The transformative power of project-based learning on language learners. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 8(8), 2025258. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2025258

Joesoef, M. V., & Adralissman. (2023). The Analysis of an IT Film Using Charles Sanders Pierce’s Semiotic Theory. E-Lingua Tera, 3(1), 224–231. https://doi.org/10.31253/lt.v3i1.2250

John-Steiner, V., & Mahn, H. (2020). Sociocultural Approaches to Learning and Development: A Vygotskian Framework. Educational Psycologist, 31(3–4), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1996.9653266

Kartikasari, D., Wibisono, H., & Setiawan, A. (2020). Ritual dan Simbol dalam Tradisi Tayub: Analisis Semiotika Budaya. Jurnal Kajian Budaya, 15(2), 113–129. https://doi.org/10.22146/jkb.2020.15.2.113-129

Kartikasari, E., Larasati, D. A., Rais, W. A., & Warto. (2020). Lexical and phonological differences in javanese in probolinggo, surabaya, and ngawi, indonesia. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 11(2), 231–241. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1102.11

Mohammadzadeh, A., Ahour, T., & Saeidi, M. (2020). A Sociocultural Perspective on Second Language Writing: The Effect of Symmetrical versus Asymmetrical Scaffolding on Intermediate EFL Learners’ Writing Accuracy, Fluency, and Complexity and Their Attitudes. Education Research International, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5292356

Neuman, W. L. (2019). Social research methods: Qualitative and Quantitative approaches. In Pearson (Seventh Ed). Pearson New International Edition. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Social-Research-Methods-Quantitative/dp/0205786839/ref=sr_1_5?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1461496914&sr=1-5&keywords=social+research+methods+qualitative+and+quantitative+approaches

Nisa, N. I. K., Sukowati, D. A., & Adi, K. R. (2021). Kesenian Tari Tayub dan Kue Hantaran sebagai Kearifan Lokal dalam Tradisi Sedekah Bumi di Kabupaten Pati. Integrasi dan Harmoni Inovatif Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 1(10), 1-10. https:// 10.17977/um063v1i102021p1090-1095

Partarakis, N., Kaplanidi, D., Doulgeraki, P., Karuzaki, E., & Petraki, E. (2021). Representation and Presentation of Culinary Tradition as Cultural Heritage. Heritage, 4(2), 612–640. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage4020036

Patton, M. . (2020). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage Publications.

Prasetyo, A. (2017). Interaksionisme Simbolik dalam Pertunjukan Tradisional. Jurnal Studi Budaya Nusantara, 5(2), 110-120.

Pratiwi, E. (2020). Dinamika Budaya Lokal. Jakarta: Obor.

Purwanto, E. (2017). Dinamika Kesenian Tayub di Tuban. Jurnal Seni dan Budaya, 12(1), 85-95.

Putri, A. D., Jaya, A., & Marleni, M. (2023). Exploring the Students’ Speaking Ability Based on Their Different Personalities. Esteem Journal of English Education Study Programme, 6(1), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v6i1.10203

Ramshaw, G. (2019). Heritage and Sport: An Introduction. Channel View Publications.

Renyaan, P., Muzrifah, R. A., & Herawati, F. (2020). Makna Dan Nilai Budaya Yang Terkandung Dalam Lagu-Lagu Daerah Evav Di Maluku Tenggara Kajian Antropology Sastra. Jurnal Disastri (Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia), 2(2), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.33752/disastri.v2i2.845

Sugiyono. (2021). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Kombinasi, R&D dan Penelitian Pendidikan) (A. Nuryanto (ed.); Kedua). ALFABETA, CV.

Suryanto, S., Mugijatna, & Susanto. (2019). Diskursus Kearifan Lokal: Bahasa Seni dalam Tari Tayub di Desa Gesi Kab. Sragen. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Linguistik Dan Sastra, 1, 505–510. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/prosidingsemantiks/article/view/39066

Tisdell, E. J., Merriam, S. B., & Struckey-Peyrot, H. L. (2025). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.

Van, J. (2020). More than just a product: Strengthening literature in sociological analysis. Sociology Compas, 14(6). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12789

Ventaja-Cruz, J., Rincón, J. M. C., Tejada-Medina, V., Martín-Moya, R., & Sánchez, R. P. (2024). Impact of the motivation, perception and self-concept of girls soccer players in multicultural contexts: a study in Melilla. Retos: Nuevas Tendencias En Educación Física, Deporte y Recreación, 60, 632–642. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v60.108908

Widiastuti, A., Supriatna, N., Disman, & Nurbayani, S. (2023). The urgency of social-creativepreneurship competency in social studies learning during the Covid-19 pandemic: Teachers’ perception. Cakrawala Pendidikan : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 42(2), 470–482. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v42i2.45754

Downloads

Published

2025-06-23